<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RNLAF / KLu</title>
	<atom:link href="https://airforces.fr/category/air-forces/eur-afs/rnlaf-klu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://airforces.fr/category/air-forces/eur-afs/rnlaf-klu/</link>
	<description>ANGLAIS AERONAUTIQUE - HISTOIRE DE L&#039;AVIATION - Gustave Whitehead, Maxime Lenoir</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 22:17:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>fr-FR</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>SCHIPOL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT IS 100 YEARS OLD</title>
		<link>https://airforces.fr/2016/02/14/schipol-international-airport-is-100-years-old/</link>
					<comments>https://airforces.fr/2016/02/14/schipol-international-airport-is-100-years-old/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toni G.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2016 10:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[20th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LISTEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIVEAU 3 OACI / ICAO LEVEL 3 plus PLS 1 / SLP 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIVEAU 4 OACI / ICAO LEVEL 4 plus PLS 2 / SLP 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNLAF / KLu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1916]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amsterdam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dutch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HISTORY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KLu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLS 2211]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Railway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNLAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schipol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIDEOS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airforces.fr/?p=10337</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Feb 14, 2016 &#8211; The Dutch airport will be one hundred years old in September this year. It used to be a military airfield on a meadow surrounded by a few huts. It has become one of the major airports<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span></p>
<div class="read-more"><a href="https://airforces.fr/2016/02/14/schipol-international-airport-is-100-years-old/">Lire la suite <span class="screen-reader-text">SCHIPOL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT IS 100 YEARS OLD</span><span class="meta-nav"> &#8250;</span></a></div>
<p><!-- end of .read-more --></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://airforces.fr/2016/02/14/schipol-international-airport-is-100-years-old/">SCHIPOL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT IS 100 YEARS OLD</a> appeared first on <a href="https://airforces.fr">AVIATION ENGLISH</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feb 14, 2016 &#8211; The Dutch airport will be one hundred years old in September this year. It used to be a military airfield on a meadow surrounded by a few huts. It has become one of the major airports in the world. The video here below might have been used for an Air-English examination. Let us play with questions &#8211; number 1 &#8211; according to the video, when was Schipol airport completely destroyed? Number 2 &#8211; Could you quote two major improvements that happened in the 1980s? Watch the video:</p>
<p><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/C-AYCBNmKHs" width="853" height="480" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Here are the answers:</span></p>
<p>Number 1: Schipol was completely destroyed during World War 2. (listen again at 00&rsquo;19 »)</p>
<p>Number 2: As far as the 1980s are concerned, you have got the choice between (listen again at 00&rsquo;47 »):</p>
<ul>
<li>The airport apron was expanded;</li>
<li>The terminal became bigger;</li>
<li>The area was beautified;</li>
<li>In time, piers and railway connections were added.</li>
</ul>
<div class="synved-social-container synved-social-container-share" style="text-align: right"><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-facebook nolightbox" data-provider="facebook" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="Share on Facebook" href="https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D10337&#038;t=SCHIPOL%20INTERNATIONAL%20AIRPORT%20IS%20100%20YEARS%20OLD&#038;s=100&#038;p&#091;url&#093;=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D10337&#038;p&#091;images&#093;&#091;0&#093;=&#038;p&#091;title&#093;=SCHIPOL%20INTERNATIONAL%20AIRPORT%20IS%20100%20YEARS%20OLD" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px;margin-right:35px"><img decoding="async" alt="Facebook" title="Share on Facebook" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/facebook.png" /></a><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-twitter nolightbox" data-provider="twitter" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="Share on Twitter" href="https://twitter.com/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D10337&#038;text=via%20%40fclanglais" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px;margin-right:35px"><img decoding="async" alt="twitter" title="Share on Twitter" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/twitter.png" /></a><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-linkedin nolightbox" data-provider="linkedin" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="Share on Linkedin" href="https://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D10337&#038;title=SCHIPOL%20INTERNATIONAL%20AIRPORT%20IS%20100%20YEARS%20OLD" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px;margin-right:35px"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="linkedin" title="Share on Linkedin" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/linkedin.png" /></a><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-mail nolightbox" data-provider="mail" rel="nofollow" title="Share by email" href="mailto:?subject=SCHIPOL%20INTERNATIONAL%20AIRPORT%20IS%20100%20YEARS%20OLD&#038;body=via%20%40fclanglais:%20https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D10337" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="mail" title="Share by email" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/mail.png" /></a></div><p>The post <a href="https://airforces.fr/2016/02/14/schipol-international-airport-is-100-years-old/">SCHIPOL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT IS 100 YEARS OLD</a> appeared first on <a href="https://airforces.fr">AVIATION ENGLISH</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://airforces.fr/2016/02/14/schipol-international-airport-is-100-years-old/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dassault Fighter Aircraft Performance and F-22, JSF F-35, Typhoon</title>
		<link>https://airforces.fr/2010/02/14/french-fighter-aircraft-performance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toni G.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[F-16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French AF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gripen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mirage 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNLAF / KLu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swiss AF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typhoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1/7 Provence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIRCRAFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armée de l'air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BFM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Block 60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BVR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Course]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dutch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurofighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exercises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Français]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helvetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JAS 39]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KLu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightning II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LISTEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manoeuvres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MiG-23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mirage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHOTOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLS 1111]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAFALE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNLAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonic boom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Su-22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supersonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tactical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIDEOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WVR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airforces.fr/?p=2744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As I have been told that this post about Rafales vs Eurofighter Typhoons, F-16s, and F-22s left some in disbelief, I believe it is fair to point out that some elements were written in bold typing as « rumours », and the<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span></p>
<div class="read-more"><a href="https://airforces.fr/2010/02/14/french-fighter-aircraft-performance/">Lire la suite <span class="screen-reader-text">Dassault Fighter Aircraft Performance and F-22, JSF F-35, Typhoon</span><span class="meta-nav"> &#8250;</span></a></div>
<p><!-- end of .read-more --></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://airforces.fr/2010/02/14/french-fighter-aircraft-performance/">Dassault Fighter Aircraft Performance and F-22, JSF F-35, Typhoon</a> appeared first on <a href="https://airforces.fr">AVIATION ENGLISH</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: justify;">As I have been told that <a href="https://airforces.fr/2009/12/20/rafale-vs-typhooneurofighter/">this post</a> about <strong>Rafales vs Eurofighter Typhoons, F-16s, and F-22s</strong> left some in disbelief, I believe it is fair to point out that some elements were written in bold typing as « rumours », and the publications quoted were not « filed » as rumours though it might have been some rumours as well &#8211; who knows, indeed? For instance, many times gossip spread about Mirage 2000s that would never shoot F-16s down. Never ever? Watch below…</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed-youtube wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-embed-aspect-4-3 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Mirage 2000 VS F16: Dogfight" width="1140" height="855" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/PdPiRyYetI8?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div></figure>



<p style="text-align: justify;">Many (on a global basis &#8211; which means <strong>not everybody</strong>) people still believe that no <strong>Rafale</strong> could outperform any <strong>F-16</strong>. Let us watch hereafter (in French, sorry).</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed-youtube wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-embed-aspect-4-3 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="RAFALE VS F16 (exercise in US)" width="1140" height="855" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/DfqJYyPevvw?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div></figure>



<p style="text-align: justify;">For those who cannot speak French, it is mentioned in this video that the <strong>Rafales</strong> defeated the <strong>F-16s</strong> in a US AFB, and the score would have been 6 &#8211; 2.</p>



<p style="text-align: justify;">Well, let us go back to <a href="https://airforces.fr/2009/12/20/rafale-vs-typhooneurofighter/">the previous Rafales&rsquo; performance post</a> for I have not added further information I had read before from a remarkable Swiss aviation specialist&rsquo;s website: <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221107194806/http://psk.blog.24heures.ch/">AVIA NEWS</a>. Pascal &#8211; AVIA NEWS webmaster &#8211; let me quote <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220626115159/http://psk.blog.24heures.ch/archive/2009/04/20/nac-seconde-offre1.html">his analysis</a> according to which the Rafale obtained the best score (95%) among the fighter aircraft evaluated for choosing which will replace the Swiss Air Force&rsquo;s F-5 Tiger. The other two competitors were the SAAB JAS-39 Gripen, and the Eurofighter / Typhoon. I am going to update <a href="https://airforces.fr/2009/12/20/rafale-vs-typhooneurofighter/">my previous article</a> about this figure.</p>



<p style="text-align: justify;">Last but not least: The Dutch did compare various fighter aircraft in 2002. Who remembers? The RNLAF &#8211; the Royal Netherlands Air Force &#8211; carried out this study and the balance sheet came out in the Dutch press:</p>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">Here is the rating reported:</h3>
<h2 style="padding-left: 180px; text-align: justify;"><strong>F-35 = 6.97</strong></h2>
<h2 style="padding-left: 180px; text-align: justify;"><strong>RAFALE = 6.95</strong></h2>
<h2 style="padding-left: 180px; text-align: justify;"><strong>Eurofighter = 5.83</strong></h2>
<h2 style="padding-left: 180px; text-align: justify;"><strong>F-16 Block 60 = 5.80</strong></h2>



<p style="text-align: justify;">Well, we must admit that the JSF / F-35 Lightning II is the best fighter among those that were assessed. However it was a close shave, wasn&rsquo;t it?</p>



<p style="text-align: justify;">Some might say « it was just an illusion ». Well, why not? Illusion would be everywhere &#8211; as for instance:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Do you really think that a serious R&amp;D organisation is used to issuing so-called <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-35_Lightning_II#Concerns_over_performance_and_safety">inaccurate reports</a>?</li><li>Do you really think that a DGA/CHEAr research director would recognize that <strong>the Rafale can be on a par with the JSF / F-35 Lightning II?</strong> This is what happened during a symposium (colloque) in January 2006.</li></ul>



<p style="text-align: justify;">As a conclusion, many people still believe that F-16s can outperform <strong>Rafales</strong>, MiG-29s, Eurofighters, and even Su-27s. <strong>This</strong> is <strong>not </strong>an illusion.</p>
<div class="synved-social-container synved-social-container-share" style="text-align: right"><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-facebook nolightbox" data-provider="facebook" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="Share on Facebook" href="https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D2744&#038;t=Dassault%20Fighter%20Aircraft%20Performance%20and%20F-22%2C%20JSF%20F-35%2C%20Typhoon&#038;s=100&#038;p&#091;url&#093;=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D2744&#038;p&#091;images&#093;&#091;0&#093;=&#038;p&#091;title&#093;=Dassault%20Fighter%20Aircraft%20Performance%20and%20F-22%2C%20JSF%20F-35%2C%20Typhoon" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px;margin-right:35px"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="Facebook" title="Share on Facebook" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/facebook.png" /></a><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-twitter nolightbox" data-provider="twitter" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="Share on Twitter" href="https://twitter.com/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D2744&#038;text=via%20%40fclanglais" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px;margin-right:35px"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="twitter" title="Share on Twitter" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/twitter.png" /></a><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-linkedin nolightbox" data-provider="linkedin" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="Share on Linkedin" href="https://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D2744&#038;title=Dassault%20Fighter%20Aircraft%20Performance%20and%20F-22%2C%20JSF%20F-35%2C%20Typhoon" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px;margin-right:35px"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="linkedin" title="Share on Linkedin" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/linkedin.png" /></a><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-mail nolightbox" data-provider="mail" rel="nofollow" title="Share by email" href="mailto:?subject=Dassault%20Fighter%20Aircraft%20Performance%20and%20F-22%2C%20JSF%20F-35%2C%20Typhoon&#038;body=via%20%40fclanglais:%20https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D2744" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="mail" title="Share by email" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/mail.png" /></a></div><p>The post <a href="https://airforces.fr/2010/02/14/french-fighter-aircraft-performance/">Dassault Fighter Aircraft Performance and F-22, JSF F-35, Typhoon</a> appeared first on <a href="https://airforces.fr">AVIATION ENGLISH</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
