<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sea Harrier</title>
	<atom:link href="https://airforces.fr/category/aircraft/miscellaneous/maritime/sea-harrier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://airforces.fr/category/aircraft/miscellaneous/maritime/sea-harrier/</link>
	<description>ANGLAIS AERONAUTIQUE - HISTOIRE DE L&#039;AVIATION - Gustave Whitehead, Maxime Lenoir</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 18:16:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>fr-FR</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Could RAFALE benefit from F-35 glitches?</title>
		<link>https://airforces.fr/2012/01/30/could-rafale-benefit-from-f-35-glitches/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toni G.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[British]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENGINEERS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F/A-18 / CF-18 / CF-188]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flight Helmet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gripen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harrier AV-8B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LISTEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIVEAU 5 OACI / ICAO LEVEL 5 plus PLS 3 / SLP 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[READ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Harrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swiss AF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typhoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5th generation fighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIRCRAFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arresting hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arrestor hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British accent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CV JSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVs-Aircraft carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dassault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dassault Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EADS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurofighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flaws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flight helmet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLIGHT SAFETY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Folding wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gripen NG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian AF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landing gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMRCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAVY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overshoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHOTOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLS 3333]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAFALE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simulating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tail hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tailhook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TECHNICAL English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test flight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US & DoD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIDEOS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airforces.fr/?p=6877</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The British Harriers were to be replaced by the F-35Cs. Do you remember? You may have learnt from the recent news that the carrier variant of the Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Joint Strike Fighter &#8211; CV JSF (Carrier Vessel variant&#8217;s Joint<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span></p>
<div class="read-more"><a href="https://airforces.fr/2012/01/30/could-rafale-benefit-from-f-35-glitches/">Lire la suite <span class="screen-reader-text">Could RAFALE benefit from F-35 glitches?</span><span class="meta-nav"> &#8250;</span></a></div>
<p><!-- end of .read-more --></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://airforces.fr/2012/01/30/could-rafale-benefit-from-f-35-glitches/">Could RAFALE benefit from F-35 glitches?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://airforces.fr">AVIATION ENGLISH</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure id="attachment_54" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-54" style="width: 287px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-54" title="40960477" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/409604771.gif" alt="JSF F-35 Lightning II" width="287" height="436" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-54" class="wp-caption-text">F-35 Lightning II</figcaption></figure>
<p>The British <strong>Harriers</strong> were to be replaced by the <strong>F-35C</strong>s. Do you remember? You may have learnt from the recent news that the carrier variant of the Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Joint Strike Fighter &#8211; CV JSF (Carrier Vessel variant&rsquo;s Joint Strike Fighter) &#8211; F-35C was <strong>unable to catch the wire onboard the aircraft carrier</strong> during the latest landing tests.</p>
<p>Strange as it may seem, the F-35C&rsquo;s designers may have not forecast what would unfold during a test flight while landing on an aircraft carrier:</p>
<p>The <strong>arresting hook</strong> (<strong>tailhook</strong>) never engaged the arresting wire as the clearance between the tail hook and the main landing gear&rsquo;s tyre tread is too short for such a speed. An <strong>F-35C Lightning II</strong> missing her carrier landing has been reported even though some U.S. officials would have dismissed such information which might result from simulated tests.</p>
<p>Added to that is a software bug which had grounded the CV JSF for 6 days a few month earlier for the fifth-generation fighter aircraft might have encountered <a title="F-35C - CV JSF" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-35C#F-35C" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wing-folding input</a> while flying!</p>
<p>As a result, the British Ministry of Defence might find a Plan-B solution as these design flaws, and <a title="F-35 - Concerns over performance and safety" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II#Concerns_over_performance_and_safety" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">some others which date back to November 2011</a> are deemed unacceptable for such an expensive fighter aircraft &#8211; $139.5 million for the F-35C (CATOBAR &#8211; Catapult Assisted Take Off But Arrested Recovery), and $150 million for the F-35B (STOVL &#8211; Short Take-Off and Vertical Landing). The latter can land on carriers but she is more expensive, and the JSF program costs have already increased several times.</p>
<h4>Moreover, the JSF would not be able to fire AMRAAM air-to-air missiles as reported in this video:</h4>
<p><center><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/GTf-eXtVVeI?rel=0" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></center></p>
<figure id="attachment_4308" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-4308" style="width: 640px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/20100523-RAFALE-La-Ferté-Alais-222.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-4308 size-full" title="20100523 RAFALE La Ferté Alais 222" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/20100523-RAFALE-La-Fert&eacute;-Alais-222.jpg" alt="RAFALE La Ferté Alais 2010 - © Xavier Cotton http://www.passionpourlaviation.fr/" width="640" height="480" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-4308" class="wp-caption-text">RAFALE La Ferté Alais 2010 © Xavier Cotton <a href="https://www.passionpourlaviation.fr/">http://www.passionpourlaviation.fr/</a></figcaption></figure>
<p>And there&rsquo;s even more: according to <a title="U.S. DoD - F-35 Quick Look Review " href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II#cite_note-104" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a Pentagon study team report</a>, 13 areas of concern that remained to be addressed in the F-35 would have been identified. For instance, the Helmet Mounted Display System (HMDS) would not work properly&#8230;</p>
<p>The British <strong>MoD</strong> is therefore considering the purchase of either <strong>F/A-18E Super Hornets</strong> or <strong>RAFALEs</strong> for the <strong>RAF</strong>. The French Dassault which has already lost the Swiss NAC tender due to replace the Swiss Air Force&rsquo;s F-5s, would be proposing a new offer with 18 RAFALEs at a cost deemed lower than the 22 SAAB Gripens&rsquo; one according to the Swiss press.</p>
<p>The <strong>RAFALE</strong> is still in competition with the <strong>Eurofighter</strong> in the <strong>Indian MMRCA tender</strong>. the Indian officials are expected to make a decision this week. To be continued&#8230; ==&gt; We have just learnt (on January 31, 2012) that the RAFALE has won the MMRCA tender&#8230; <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/1f642.png" alt="🙂" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /></p>
<p><center>Photo 1: <a href="https://airforces.fr/contact/"> © Recce 233 Savoie</a>; Photo 2:<a href="https://www.passionpourlaviation.fr/"> © Xavier Cotton &#8211; http://passiondesavions.blogspot.com/</a></center></p>
<div class="synved-social-container synved-social-container-share" style="text-align: right"><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-facebook nolightbox" data-provider="facebook" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="Share on Facebook" href="https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D6877&#038;t=Could%20RAFALE%20benefit%20from%20F-35%20glitches%3F&#038;s=100&#038;p&#091;url&#093;=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D6877&#038;p&#091;images&#093;&#091;0&#093;=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F08%2F409604771.gif&#038;p&#091;title&#093;=Could%20RAFALE%20benefit%20from%20F-35%20glitches%3F" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px;margin-right:35px"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="Facebook" title="Share on Facebook" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/facebook.png" /></a><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-twitter nolightbox" data-provider="twitter" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="Share on Twitter" href="https://twitter.com/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D6877&#038;text=via%20%40fclanglais" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px;margin-right:35px"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="twitter" title="Share on Twitter" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/twitter.png" /></a><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-linkedin nolightbox" data-provider="linkedin" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="Share on Linkedin" href="https://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D6877&#038;title=Could%20RAFALE%20benefit%20from%20F-35%20glitches%3F" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px;margin-right:35px"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="linkedin" title="Share on Linkedin" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/linkedin.png" /></a><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-mail nolightbox" data-provider="mail" rel="nofollow" title="Share by email" href="mailto:?subject=Could%20RAFALE%20benefit%20from%20F-35%20glitches%3F&#038;body=via%20%40fclanglais:%20https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D6877" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="mail" title="Share by email" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/mail.png" /></a></div><p>The post <a href="https://airforces.fr/2012/01/30/could-rafale-benefit-from-f-35-glitches/">Could RAFALE benefit from F-35 glitches?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://airforces.fr">AVIATION ENGLISH</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEA HARRIER FA2 Model Video</title>
		<link>https://airforces.fr/2008/11/21/sea-harrier-fa2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toni G.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[A - Basic user]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[about PLS/SLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR FORCES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIRCRAFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B - Independent user]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European AFs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LISTEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MARITIME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIVEAU 3 OACI / ICAO LEVEL 3 plus PLS 1 / SLP 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIVEAU 4 OACI / ICAO LEVEL 4 plus PLS 2 / SLP 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIVEAU 5 et 6 OACI / ICAO LEVEL 5 and 6 plus PLS 4 / SLP 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIVEAU 5 OACI / ICAO LEVEL 5 plus PLS 3 / SLP 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Harrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIGHTERS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrust-vectoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turbofan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIDEOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VTOL]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airforces.fr/?p=1347</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Visit: Aircraft Models Website FLORYMODELS</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://airforces.fr/2008/11/21/sea-harrier-fa2/">SEA HARRIER FA2 Model Video</a> appeared first on <a href="https://airforces.fr">AVIATION ENGLISH</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe loading="lazy" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/kDLoAo2NquA" width="640" height="360" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Visit: <a href="https://www.florymodels.org/vlog/" target="_blank">Aircraft Models Website FLORYMODELS</a></p>
<div class="synved-social-container synved-social-container-share" style="text-align: right"><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-facebook nolightbox" data-provider="facebook" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="Share on Facebook" href="https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D1347&#038;t=SEA%20HARRIER%20FA2%20Model%20Video&#038;s=100&#038;p&#091;url&#093;=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D1347&#038;p&#091;images&#093;&#091;0&#093;=&#038;p&#091;title&#093;=SEA%20HARRIER%20FA2%20Model%20Video" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px;margin-right:35px"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="Facebook" title="Share on Facebook" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/facebook.png" /></a><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-twitter nolightbox" data-provider="twitter" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="Share on Twitter" href="https://twitter.com/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D1347&#038;text=via%20%40fclanglais" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px;margin-right:35px"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="twitter" title="Share on Twitter" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/twitter.png" /></a><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-linkedin nolightbox" data-provider="linkedin" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="Share on Linkedin" href="https://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D1347&#038;title=SEA%20HARRIER%20FA2%20Model%20Video" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px;margin-right:35px"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="linkedin" title="Share on Linkedin" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/linkedin.png" /></a><a class="synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-64 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-mail nolightbox" data-provider="mail" rel="nofollow" title="Share by email" href="mailto:?subject=SEA%20HARRIER%20FA2%20Model%20Video&#038;body=via%20%40fclanglais:%20https%3A%2F%2Fairforces.fr%2F%3Fp%3D1347" style="font-size: 0px;width:64px;height:64px;margin:0;margin-bottom:35px"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="mail" title="Share by email" class="synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share" width="64" height="64" style="display: inline;width:64px;height:64px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none" src="https://airforces.fr/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/128x128/mail.png" /></a></div><p>The post <a href="https://airforces.fr/2008/11/21/sea-harrier-fa2/">SEA HARRIER FA2 Model Video</a> appeared first on <a href="https://airforces.fr">AVIATION ENGLISH</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
